Reading a piece by
Ahmer Naqvi in Cricinfo made me chuckle. Some Pakistani critics
"insulted" Bilawal Bhatti by saying that looked like an Indian
quickie! But there is a deeper story guiding that thought process than meets
the eye. Many an Indian fan yearns for a fast bowler with swagger that can send
stumps cartwheeling and put fear into the opposition batsmen. When will India
win a test match on the backs of a fast bowling performance like Mitchell
Johnson delivered at the Gabba or the West Indian quicks did with regularity or
Akram and Younis did in the nineties.
India's victories
usually happen due to guile, cunning, skill and above all attritional batting.
Very rarely has India tamed a fast bowling machine on fast pitches and dished
out what it has got. There's not much disrespect in posting small totals in the
face of hostile fast bowling. That's the normal outcome. What's annoying to an
Indian fan is that India doesn't dish it out in kind. There was much joy when
Sreesanth made Kallis hop and had him caught on the last tour to South Africa.
But those feats were few and far between. Even the great Kapil Dev never
terrorized batsmen. Srinath was India's best fast bowler in my time (and probably all time) and even he managed it only a couple of times.
Opposing teams and
journalists only grudingly respect India's victories at home because they only
project cunning, not courage. There is something to be said for bravery and
courage in a sporting contest. Indians know this too. This is why they
celebrate Gavaskar's thirteen hundreds against the pace battery of the West
Indies. While modern Indian batsmen have got the aggression down and pretty
much bat like the West Indies of the eighties or Aussies of the nineties, India
has still not developed a fast bowling culture like our neighbors next door to
the west. The old fashioned gladiatorial instincts still stimulate a lot of fan
excitement. The experience of watching Mitchell Johnson and the Australian pace
pack hunt down England at the Gabba was pulse pounding. Contrast that to Ashwin
and Ojha plucking out Aussie wickets at Mohali. While victory is sweet, it's
sweeter when it comes in a contest where there is a fierce exchange of blows.
And such a contest can only be generated by hostile fast bowling.
Here's to Umesh
Yadav. May he simply bowl fast at the rib cages and armpits of South African
batsmen and terrorize them. Make them cry and wanna go home like Jonathon
Trott. I have sympathy for Jonathon's illness, but it's clear that Mitchell
Johnson hastened the advent of those symptoms. And let me point out that they did not show up when facing spin bowlers in India. If Yadav bowls
anything like Johnson and Zaheer is truly back to his smartest, then India have
a great chance to be exciting in South Africa. With Ishant Sharma to play the
containment role, India can keep the pressure on South African batsmen.
Accomplished as the South African batsmen are, good fast bowling tames even the
best of the best.
This is wishful
thinking probably. The reality is that Indian batting is inexperienced, though
talented. This will probably be a repeat of the 1999 tour to Australia where
India lost 3-0 and only Tendulkar and VVS Laxman emerged with some honors. A
couple of daddy hundreds will be needed from Pujara, Sharma or Kohli to make a
statement. India's batsmen will also need to be ready for hostile, angry and
intimidating fast bowling. They can't whine or complain. They need to stand up,
man up and punch back. Only then will they really win respect in the eyes of
the opposition. Bring out the hooks and pulls occasionally and put the
opposition bowlers on notice that India were not going to duck and weave all
the time but were ready to take it on. Michael Clarke put Stuart Broad in his
place early in the second innings by doing just that. Ganguly did that in
Brisbane in 2003 in the first test by crashing a fantastic century that
included some delightful pulls and crisp cuts.
Most of that is
day dreaming. In all honesty I see
India losing 2-0.