tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6864256843243038572024-03-13T23:08:08.023-05:00Opinions On CricketVidooshak & Golandaaz [ Analysis - Portraits - Opinions ]Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.comBlogger407125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-12170818689498417692023-02-06T14:30:00.019-06:002023-02-06T14:34:33.198-06:00Cummins' Australia are here to win<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span> <span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">Australia don't seem to be here to complain about the pitches. It would not be entirely appropriate to count Ian Healy's comments on "fair pitches" to reflect the Australian Team's views.</span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">Test matches in India do seem to get over sooner than they used to in years past. That trend in unlikely to change. India is keen to assert it's right to make pitches that spin from day one, even if it leads to 2 and 3 day Tests.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span><span><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">Australia are a proud team that has lost 2 consecutive series at home to India. They've come here to win. </span><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">India on the other hand are not as strong a batting side compared to a few years ago, even at home. Pant's unfortunate injury is a big blow. He can't be replaced. </span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">Australia will rely on pace and Lyon. They seem equipped match India's bowlers in intensity and skill. And Cummins and the fast men have the capacity to remove the pitch factor from the equation</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">This will be Cummins' opportunity to embrace greatness. Some contests rise above factors such as skill, techniques and conditions. Some contests go to teams that just want to win more desperately. England have shown the way on how such wins can be engineered.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">The era of Root, Kohli and Williamson as captains is over. Babar's leadership is in crisis of sorts; having lost home series' to Australia and England and the inability to beat New Zealand. There is a buzz around Cummins' captaincy. He would love to start the upcoming Ashes series with a win of his own in India and Stoke's equal. </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span><span><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">It's been a while since India have talked about the desire to win. The "we follow a process" language has crept back in. </span><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;">I am sticking my head out and predicting an Australia win by 2 Tests with Labuschagne doing a Damien Martyn from the 2005 series.</span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></span><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; color: #0f1419; font-size: 20px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></div>Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-68484419241568449542022-10-02T15:59:00.008-05:002022-10-03T11:40:31.072-05:00India's Cricketing Identity<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">Sport, often, has a way of elevating itself beyond the
imagination of the most ardent fans. Sport can inspire people to great feats
and define teams and nations by the actions of the sportspeople.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">Jessie Owens discredited Hitler’s theory of white supremacy
in his backyard by winning four Olympic medals. This despite Owens himself not
having the freedom to exercise his own rights at home in the USA. We also remember
Lutz Long his vanquished German opponent who graciously accepted defeat and
much to the Chancellor’s discomfiture boldly congratulated Owens.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">We know of Smith and Carlos of the 1968 Mexico Olympics who
raised their fists in salute to the civil rights movement in the United States.
The courage of the Australian athlete, Peter Norman, who stood in solidarity is
etched in sport lore. He dealt with the ostracism at home by his
racist administration with great dignity and achieved great honor across the world rising above the pettiness of his countrymen. In time, the rest of Australia came to his point of view. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">Many more such stories abound of courage by Indian cricketers
such as Lala Amarnath, CK Nayudu, Vengsarkar and others. These players defied
authorities and inspired both their teams and the people of their country. There
is no greater honor than representing one’s country at the global stage to most
sportspeople. And such honor to represent means that the conduct of the
sportspeople reflects on the country and its people. The way a sports team or a
sports person plays his sport representing his nation says a lot about the
country itself to outsiders even in this day and age of the internet. In our
recent memory, we’ve seen many a downfall from Ben Johnson (Canada) to the
recent Russian doping scandal that led to shame for the country. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">India has been emerging recently as a strong sporting nation
with medals in Olympics and Commonwealth games. India’s athletes are moving up
the sporting ladder with creditable displays in sports ranging from track and
field events to badminton, boxing and the like. It’s no longer an anomaly to
see an athlete from India contend for gold.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>As an emerging sporting nation, the world’s eyes are on India. The world
watches because India is a giant, raucous democracy and its growth inspires
many other fledgling nations who are also on the same path. Across the border
from India is China. A country with its authoritarian government has already
made its mark in world athletics. Where India goes next and how it gets there
is of enormous interest to others. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">It is in this context that one must evaluate the recent
events on the cricket field where Deepti Sharma ran out Charlotte Dean at the
non-striker’s end in an inconsequential game to win it. The series was already won.
This game could have gone either way, and India had the upper hand. England had
to get another 15 or so runs with only a wicket in hand, though they had plenty
of overs to get them in. As such, Indian bowlers had plenty of opportunity to win
the game. The game was thus tantalizingly poised. In such a situation, India
chose to run out the non-striker denying the public what I consider a proper cricket
outcome. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">A lot of ink has been spilled, name calling, accusations of
deceit and cheating have been traded between former and current cricketers,
journalists, twitteratti and trolls. Most have staked out their positions and
taken sides. What’s striking is that almost all the Indian elite – cricketers and
commentators – have defended this action as an appropriate tit for the runner’s
tat of frequently leaving the crease early. Many have cited rules and breaking
of rules and bowlers being put in uncomfortable positions. Some have gone to
the extent of citing culture and colonialism and suggesting this as a form of
defiance and rebellion. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">However, the context of the game is important and India’s reputation as
a sporting nation is at stake. Deepti Sharma didn’t run out a non-striker in
the middle of a game. It wasn’t just any other run-out. It was done to end the
game. It was done to deny Charlotte Dean, a tailender, the opportunity to script
a story book finish and perhaps begin another legend. Sports thrives on these
types of heroic stories. Its great for the growth of sports and would have
inspired many more women perhaps to take up cricket. On the other hand, had
Deepti or another Indian bowler got the last wicket, Indian girls would have
been equally proud of the sporting accomplishment of their team and would have
been equally inspired. By choosing not to fight the good fight against an England player bending the rules by leaving the crease, Deepti chose the easy way out. She signaled to
others that she didn’t have the stomach for a good fight. That she and her team-mates didn't have one more heroic effort in them to pry out the last wicket. That they were simply content to win a game with minimal effort. And that winning at all costs was very important because that's what they deserved. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">Imagine if Greg Matthews had run Maninder Singh or Ravi Shastri
out in the amazing Madras (now Chennai) test that ended in a tie. Imagine if he
had done it the very last over before Shastri scored the single to secure the
tie. How sad would it have been to the public to have been denied that story
book ending? Does it really matter who does this? India or someone else? Imagine
if Abey Kuruvilla was
done in by the great Kapil Dev in that epic Ranji Trophy final between Bombay
(now Mumbai) and Haryana. And more recently if Rishab Pant was cut down at Gabba in this manner. Now imagine if this sort of running out non-strikers becomes
a regular feature. How many great finishes would the sport lose?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">By staking out the position, Indian cricket and many supporters
have on this issue, they are being extremely short-sighted. They want to show a
middle finger to the rest of the world that talks about spirit of the game and
fairness. They also point to everyone else's past mistakes to justify this. The reality though is that it suggests a nation bitter at
its place in the cricketing world. Its perhaps a larger reflection of a
disappointed and angry nation that’s upset that China and others are leaving it behind while
its potential is being wasted away. It’s the act of a bitter team that feels
entitled to win but is unable to. India wasn’t losing because Dean was sneaking
a few inches. India hadn’t lost the game yet, but it was clear it had lost the will
to fight. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">The larger picture though is the brand of sport India wants
to play. This isn’t an enjoyable brand of any sport, let alone cricket. Taking
the fun out of a sporting context simply to win at all costs is going to reduce cricket to a farce. India has to reckon with its cricketing
identity. It sits on the largest talent pool in the world. This is not how its
going to gain the world’s respect. There’s still time to put the genie back in
the bottle. India needs to stop resorting to these tactics. Captains, commentators
and others need to come out and ask difficult questions. This isn’t a question
of whether a player was following rules. This isn't Deepti Sharma or Ashwin's cross to bear, but that of a culture of cricket being developed in India for the foreseeable future. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">Bodyline, underarm and other larger events have occurred that
changed cricket forever. These were all well within the rules. The purveyors of
those tactics didn’t come away with their reputations enhanced but with notoriety.
India is deciding to choose Jardine over Bradman and Chappell over dignity of
sport. India must think hard and long before choosing to follow such false heroes.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>Vidooshakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03194362115018768416noreply@blogger.com0Chicago, IL, USA41.8781136 -87.629798213.567879763821153 -122.7860482 70.188347436178844 -52.473548199999996tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-29028299335286965192019-01-08T13:58:00.002-06:002019-01-08T13:58:52.684-06:00India's away campaign in 2018<div style="text-align: justify;">
In any other time in Indian cricket, 4 Test wins across consecutive tours to South Africa, England and Australia in a 12 month period, would be hailed without conditions. This is however not any other time in Indian cricket. This is the time of Virat Kohli. The one of a winning mindset. The one who puts team goals before individual milestones. The one who wants his bowlers to bowl fast. The one who doesn't mind losing a Test in the quest for a victory. The one who appears willing to live and die by outcomes of cricket matches an not by the number of 100s he and his mates score. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Virat Kohli is not your regular Indian great. Winning is a large part of who Virat Kohli is. In order to win, Virat Kohli is willing to put the building blocks needed to seek victories. He batted for the coach he wanted, he pushed his players to be more fit, he invested in fast bowlers, he embraced a no-excuses mindset and he created a team culture that did not honor seniority by default. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And he talked of winning abroad. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Some saw the spark and a glimpse of what was in store in his first match as captain in Adelaide 2014. Even as India lost that Test, they lost going for an improbable win. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Since that Test, Virat Kohli has taken India to number one in Test rankings. India have won pretty much everything in sight at home. Outside India, they have won in Sri Lanka and the West Indies. While winning in West Indies is not as hard as it used to be, winning in Sri Lanka as India did after 22 years was special. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When it comes to winning in England and South Africa, Virat Kohli's India has not broken new ground and in fact under performed in comparison to some of the previous teams who have won tests and drawn series in South Africa and won Test series in England. While the series win in Australia may go a long way in giving the Kohli-Shastri team some breathing space, overall the combined outcome of the 12 Tests in South Africa, England and Australia is a bit disappointing. 4 wins, 7 losses and 1 draw does no justice to the promise of Virat Kohli from 4 years ago. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I had expected more.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Even so, when you dissect the Test matches, you can draw some conclusions that may lead to a more optimistic outlook for India in the future.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India now have a Test team that can capitalize when conditions and turn of events are even slightly in their favor. Except for the rain in Sydney, India won all Tests when they batted first and when their bowlers were presented the opportunity to bowl last in helpful bowling conditions. They even delivered under pressure of defending smallish first innings targets set by their batsmen. The 250 in the first innings at Adelaide and 187 in the first innings at Johannesburg come to mind. India now have the bowling to get them back in games when their batsmen fail to provide the first innings cushion. Prior to the 2018 tours, in Tests since January 2000, India had lost 15 tests on the road when their batsmen scored 250 or less in the first innings; 11 of them either by an innings or 10 wickets. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India's bowling has improved but only compared to their own bowling from previous teams. Both in South Africa and in England the home team out bowled India. Previous pace attacks from India were so abysmal or good only in spurts that an attack that consistently takes 20 wickets seems above any criticism. To win Tests however, you have to out bowl the opposition bowlers consistently. On the tour to South Africa, the home bowlers did not match up to the exploits of the South African pacers and in England the home teams all rounders proved too much for India's bowlers to match in skill and variety. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On difficult pitches India's batting hasn't been able to produce one of those freakish performances that defy norms and conditions. The pitches on offer have been tough and the fourth innings targets have been tricky. As a collective batting unit, rarely across the 7 losses; all when batting second; have India's batsmen been blown away, any more than the home batsmen have struggled. Batting conditions have been tough across the 3 series. To compare the averages of batsmen in this series with previous performances on more friendly pitches and conclude that India's batting has let themselves down is misleading. The only way India could have won any of those 7 tests they lost is if their bowlers would have out bowled the home team bowlers or their batsmen produced a freak performance. Singling out only one aspect is trying to ignore the context of conditions. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Winning in Australia is satisfying but the performances across the 3 series which was the most anticipated away season was ultimately humbling. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-57228960554688140152018-03-27T13:10:00.002-05:002018-03-27T14:38:46.799-05:00Australia Gains the High Ground<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The condemnation from the Australian media, past cricketers, commentators and the Prime Minister himself was swift and furious. The ink had barely dried on Steve Smith's arrogant acknowledgement of cheating and self absolution, claiming that he was "still the best man to lead" the Australian team. This is a player who has been on a Bradmanesque run making streak. Almost single-handedly holding the team's weak batting together to give their bowlers enough to win matches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Now we hear of a possible life ban. His deputy, Warner, often in the cross-hairs of the behavior police, and Australia's second best run-maker in the team is also being potentially benched. An unheard of fierce response to an offense that is not the highest offense in the ICC's list of things that can get you in trouble.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There's glee, schadenfreude and a merry goulash of emotions emanating from all over the cricketing world. Past players, current players, commentators, bloggers have all been piling on. The reaction from many thinking people has been one of confusion. Unclear as to why Cricket Australia and the public would be willing to dump their best and second best player for a seemingly trivial offense. That too when the perpetrator has acknowledged, apologized, received the due punishment from ICC and is ready to move on.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The tendency of most boards is to "back their players" when charged with offenses. Most recently, South Africa mounted a furious six hour defense of Kagiso Rabada to dumb down a serious charge. India has routinely thrown tantrums when their players were caught on camera messing with the ball or charged with offenses that would lead to bans. Pakistan has deemed it worthy to forfeit a match and work "posthumously" to get their captain acquitted.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Australia taking the opposite route. Not only are they not backing their players, they are throwing the kitchen sink at them. They are putting the spirit of cricket above a book of ICC rules. Australia have always been proud of playing hard, but "fair". The people had been supportive of the players as long as they felt they were not cheating. But that thin string of trust has been broken by evidence and followed up with a banal apology.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
No Australian till now had ever been sanctioned for cheating (ball tampering). Siddle came close but was found not guilty by the referee. Australia has never appealed against a match referee's decision for any offense. They have lived up to the commitment to the process. Contrast that with the responses from other nations.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Australia is willing to let go of their best players to maintain the sanctity of their country's hard won image of fair play. There is no better way to demonstrate commitment to fair sport. Those who see shallowness, opportunism or hypocrisy in this are well-served to look into their own country's responses. The best way out of darkness is sunshine and the Australian PM, public and board are willing to lose the cricket games to ensure that their integrity and sanctity is not put in doubt.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Australia has refrained from spinning a yarn around this, not played the victim and is copping it on their chin. Past players have spoken with one voice. Not one player past or present has come out in support of the players or coach seeking a more lenient view.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Other countries have defined patriotism to mean that any "smear" on their reputation is to be dealt with fierce outrage and potential retribution. This approach serves to embolden perpetrators to bend rules in the name of national honor (winning games). Australia, refreshingly I may add, has taken the approach that no one is allowed to compromise the honor of the nation by cheating in the name of the nation. Australia have attained the moral high ground and the hypocrites stand exposed. India, South Africa and others would do well to follow the Australian example instead of doubling down.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Vidooshakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03194362115018768416noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-49503245330535706862018-01-19T19:44:00.000-06:002018-01-19T23:33:22.462-06:00Something fishy about the South African pitches<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">When South Africa toured India in the winter of 2015, the Nagpur Test lasted 247 overs. A little shy of 3 days assuming a 90 over day. The Capetown Test in comparison lasted 230 overs. And yet after the Nagpur Test questions were raised about the the pitch. It clearly seemed like the pitch had played out of character in comparison to previous Tests on the same ground. A combative Ravi Shastri; the architect of the "Hirwani Test"; had argued the right of the home team to make pitches that suit the strength of the home team.</span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
It left a bad taste in the mouth for purists and Ian Chappel, who'd rather not have host captains meddle with pitch preparation. There was no real evidence of that but Ravi Shastri's comments did not help rule that possibility out.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
South Africa lost the Nagpur Test by 124 runs. 40 wickets fell and The highest score in 4 innings in that Test was 215 that India scored on the first day. India too struggled to bat on the pitch</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The ICC promptly called out Nagpur for the pitch not meeting Test standards. Or something like that.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
Take the Capetown Test, the first Test on India's the ongoing tour of South Africa.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
India lost the test by 72 runs. 40 wickets fell and The highest score in 4 innings in that Test was 286 that South Africa scored on the first day. South Africa too struggled to bat on the pitch.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The Capetown pitch too played out of character. Just like in Nagpur, the scores in this Test at Capetown deviated from the norm. Yet the reaction from commentators which included ex-players was that this was a great Test match. No one questioned the pitch. Just that it had "spice". The ICC is unlikely to sanction the pitch.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The shortness of the Test even compared to the short Nagpur Test was perhaps masked by the fact the official 3rd day in Capetown was washed out. Another factor could have been that India gave a much better account of themselves and thanks to some sparks from Hardik Pandya, and Bhuvaneshwar Kumar did not get blown away, like the South Africans were at Nagpur. Yet another factor that masked its shortness and prevented any questions about the pitch was that the scoring rate at Capetown across the Test, was 3.3 runs per over as compared to only 2.6 runs at Nagpur. So the Capetown Test was indeed more exciting than the Nagpur Test. There was more attractive cricket.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The single biggest factor though I feel that the pitch was never brought into discussion and assumed to be true and sporting was that India did not make an issue out of it. They had promised not to do so because otherwise it would have been hypocritical.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
India seemed to have boxed themselves into letting South Africa and popular opinions; which do not always lend kindness to a traveling Indian team; run away with dictating the narrative of the pitches. So much so that in the second Test, they let Morne Morkel get away with setting the narrative that the Centurion pitch was "like playing in the subcontinent". India did not counter. They could not.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The rivalry between South Africa and India has deteriorated to a point that both sides are scared of losing at home to the other and not confident of winning in typical home conditions.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
India started it.</div>
</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
I was hoping South Africa would take the high ground which would lead India to follow suit.</div>
</span>Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-22839727469575058812017-07-17T20:11:00.000-05:002017-07-17T20:17:56.019-05:00India Coach: Kumble has himself to blame<div style="text-align: justify;">
When Anil Kumble was plucked out of nowhere and inserted as coach of India's national team, he was staring at a 13 Test home season and a mildly strenuous tour of the West Indies. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He was in charge of a team that was already the best in the world in Test cricket. He had friends in high places who had put him as coach in the first place, removing his predecessor Ravi Shastri on what can be called a technicality. In Virat Kohli, he had a captain who had in the previous year and a half showed a willingness to play for wins at all times. A captain who seemed to have developed specific ideas on how to go about doing it. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A 5 bowler strategy; albeit which was occasionally sacrificed, banking on pace - no more just bowling in the "right areas", a premium on scoring rate; which put Cheteshwar Pujara's spot under pressure early on and lastly fitness by example. Those ideas were already bringing in the results. India's batting had a memorable tour of Australia in 2014/2015 and when India's fast bowlers joined the captain's vision, they won an away Test series in Sri Lanka for the first time in 23 years. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All Kumble had to do was to understand this blueprint and build a rapport with the captain, his team and treat them as equals. More importantly, treat them like adults. Ravi Shastri before him, tends to do just that. He becomes one of them. This is not to say that this is an ideal strategy for a coach. For another team, for another time, Shastri may just be the wrong man for the job.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is pretty hard to argue though that this particular Indian team with abundance and variety of skills, a professional approach to fitness led by a captain with definitive ideas on winning and early results that validated his leadership; needed anything more than a catalyst coach. A coach who would focus on removing any roadblocks with the board and help the team execute this blueprint. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If Anil Kumble now finds himself out of a coaching job, it is quite baffling that he has botched up a very easy assignment. What really irks me about the whole Kumble episode though is that he has managed to walk away with all the sympathy and the media and ex-players have tried to paint Virat Kohli as the "spoilt brat". The people, the experts and the media seem hurt that a legend was treated unfairly. Is being a great leg spinner for your country an insurance against future job firing, without your value even so much as considered.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There are however 2 things one must credit Kumble for. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One of that is the pitches. Ravi Shastri is a hawk when it comes to over engineered pitches. His only Test has captain and the few Tests with him as the Team director (coach) for home Tests have coincided with pitches that were minefields. There is admittedly no evidence of a coach having an influence over pitches but Ravi Shastri has wholeheartedly defended India's right to engineer minefields, claiming that "everyone else does it too". Under Kumble the pitches have been true and Kumble has a higher sense of spirit of the game than Shastri. The later is more like an Australian; willing to challenge norms if not the rules outright. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Secondly, he seemed to have played a role in getting Chetashwar Pujara back into the team after he lost his place to what Virat Kohli claimed as an inability "to force the pace". Pujara is a valuable player at a crucial spot and his dropping may be a case of Virat Kohli being too aggressive for the sake of being aggressive. Notice how England have been struggling to win Tests without a solid number 3. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In sum though, Anil Kumble has probably only himself to blame for his inability to forge a working relationship with Kohli and to get on board with his blueprint. This is after all Kohli's team and the choice of Kohli over Kumble in a situation where the 2 are not on talking terms, is the most logical one. It should have been made without showing Virat Kohli in bad light.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And what of the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC)? Their job is actually easier than Kumble's. It also comes with no apparent accountability. How do we know for sure the CAC is doing its job well and what's the consequence of not doing it well? Who is to tell Sachin Tendulkar not to show up for work and face the wrath of crazed fans and a worshiping media? </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This committee exists to advice on the selection of a coach. It is understood by most reasonable people that an advice is kind of a recommendation. On the 2 instances they were tasked with the mundane job of finding a coach; a job most boards and the BCCI themselves carry out without much fanfare; the CAC have raised eyebrows. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The CAC consists of Sachin Tendulkar, Saurav Ganguly and VVS Laxman. Very important people and big names all. Just because a job is carried out by important people doesn't make the job itself any more important than what it originally is. It was to simply recommend a coach. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Instead, the first time around they offered the job to Anil Kumble who had not applied for it; removing Shastri because he chose to interview via Skype and the second time around they seemed reluctant to give Virat Kohli, the coach he wanted and when they did offer it to Shastri, they seemed to sneak in 2 more of their classmates as batting and bowling coaches. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Leaving their on field exploits from their playing days, aside the CAC have not shown the maturity, the ability to rise above personal friendships, remain on the sidelines and do what's right for Virat Kohli and Team India. There is no bigger conflict of interest in cricket today than the CAC recommending their classmates for important jobs in the day to day functioning of the cricket team. The committee, if needed at all, needs to be more diverse and educated on the basics of cricket administration. Right now its just runs and 100s heavy. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That leaves Virat Kohli and his role in this episode. So far he has played it with a straight bat, like his new coach would have liked and managed to stay above the immaturity shown by his seniors in using the glory of their playing days to garner sympathy and writing letters leaked to the press playing the victim.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In my books Virat Kohli comes out of this episode the clear winner by simply staying out of it and knowing how to get what he wants to execute his strategy to win Test matches for India. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-41585356349484788462017-06-21T12:15:00.002-05:002017-06-21T13:14:45.342-05:00The Mistakes are Piling Up<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Virat Kohli arrived like a breath of fresh air as captain in 2014 and has delivered on nearly every front. I was sold on his brand of cricket. It was the brand that I had wanted from the Sachin generation, but never materialized. I was disillusioned when Sachin quit as captain and gave up on wanting to mold an aggressive team that would play to win. Kohli had reversed all that. Losses didn't matter. What mattered was the brand of aggressive cricket we played. We played to win, not draw and as a result we probably lost some matches we could have drawn. <br />
<br />
The recent home season in India continued that brand of cricket. New Zealand and England were put to the sword in an almost Australia-like manner. Umesh Yadav, Mohammed Shami and Ishant Sharma were unleashed and spinners too bowled aggressive, attacking lines. Batsmen, led by Pujara and the captain himself bossed some of the best bowlers in the world. This was a never before seen exhibition of big cricket from an Indian team. Gone seemed to be the days of percentage cricket to minimize losses and attrition methods to swoop down on the opposition with a spin attack when the chance came. <br />
<br />
All of this came to screeching halt in the second test versus Australia. The opposition won the first test by besting India in its own conditions. The captain himself was tamed and Australia romped to a well deserved win. The first signs of mistakes started in the second test. Kohli was pouting about sledging, his runs deserted him against a well-thought out strategy by Australian quicks and spinners and he seemed to have no answers. Instead of backing his original strategy and demanding execution from his team-mates, he caved in and gave up on the three fast men strategy. It was only in the final test that India returned to its Kohli roots and Umesh Yadav's blistering spell opened up the Dharmasala test for India to win the series. But a lot of unanswered questions remained. <br />
<br />
Who backtracked on the team composition? Why did it take a test played under Rahane (Kohli was injured) for India to redeploy the plan that had worked so well for most of the season? Why did Kohli retreat to a "draw first" mindset? Why did Kohli sulk and pout about sledging when he knew what is always in store playing versus Australia? Shades of the Anderson-Jadeja "pushing" saga where India promptly lost the remaining tests? Kohli's inability to cope with Australia's bowling plans too was pushed under the carpet following a productive IPL. Clearly, Kohli didn't work on these weaknesses as we will see later.<br />
<br />
On the ODI front, India are a team that is rebuilding. However, the approach in the Champions Trophy didn't reflect that at all. The loss versus Sri Lanka should have opened the captain's eyes to India's weaknesses. As much as people want to make it about bowling, it wasn't. The weakness was in India batting. The batting line-up is being re-built with Yuvraj, Dhoni in unfamiliar roles. Kedar Jadhav and Hardik Pandya as finishers too was a new set up. In the first ODI versus England at home, Yuvraj and Dhoni both failed in pursuit of 350 and it was Kedar and Hardik along with Kohli that brought India home. A first sign that experience didn't count for much when chasing big runs. Perhaps. In the last ODI too India failed to reach the target by five runs, but it was Jadhav and Pandya that nearly pulled it off and not Dhoni and Yuvraj. Including both these veterans was clearly proven to be a mistake. <br />
<br />
It's safe to say that India over-achieved in the Champions Trophy. On a day when Jadhav and Kohli have off-days, India cannot chase much is what it feels like. Yuvraj and Dhoni are not the answers. The real shocker though wasn't the decision to chase with an unproven batting line-up. The biggest mistake was once again perhaps on the bowling front. Excluding Umesh Yadav to bring in the "experienced" Ashwin was probably the biggest blooper that no one wants to talk about. Yadav has demonstrated his shock value in pressure situations. Where both teams are under pressure. In the final test versus Australia when they had to force the situation in order to gain the Border-Gavaskar trophy back, Yadav broke open the game with a blistering spell. Perhaps the best ever by an Indian bowler in my life time on Indian soil (with due respect to Srinath). Yadav proved this again in the first game of the Champions Trophy where he broke the back of Pakistan's batting. He was dropped based on his performance versus Sri Lanka, though the real issue there was Yuvraj's inability to fire and help put up a total beyond Sri Lanka's reach on that featherbed. <br />
<br />
Speaking about Kohli's failure in the final. He fell exactly the way Australia plotted his downfall in the test series. Played on his patience outside off-stump with away swinging or angling deliveries and forced him into a mistake. Kohli didn't have an answer then and no answer versus Amir either.<br />
<br />
Add to this Kohli's spat with Kumble. The first cracks became visible in the curious case of Cheteshwar Pujara. Pujara forcing his way back into the team on Kohli's terms was a heart-warming event. And Kohli said the right things about Pujara and his re-invented batting style. The first mistake was perhaps Kumble speaking out of turn to suggest that his word about Pujara mattered more than what the captain felt.<br />
<br />
Apparently, the duo wasn't on speaking terms for six months. Yet, Kumble claims that he only came to know from BCCI that the captain didn't have confidence in him. Ridiculousness at its worst. A captain deserves a coach that he can work with. We dumped Chappell who didn't do well with Sachin (though he wasn't captain). No one knows where Dravid stood on that. Luckily Kumble excused himself though the hypocritical Committee wanted him to continue. Hypocritical because this was the same group that rebelled against Chappell and got him canned. <br />
<br />
We really don't know who had the final say in team selections or the strategies. It's clear that a number of mistakes have been made that have produced bad results and is souring the team's relationship with ardent, thinking fans, who have yearned for an approach like Kohli seemed to have been advocating. Hopefully, Kohli will reflect on these last few months and usher in the few minor changes that are needed to reduce mistakes. I hope that the new coach is supportive of the captain and is willing work with him to make his vision a reality. The ODI team has a few leaks yet before it can be deemed ready for the World Cup. The test team has fewer holes, but some disturbing things have happened. <br />
<br />
It's time to eliminate these mistakes and play to potential A well fought loss (like the ones in 2014 in Australia are more exciting than dull draws and pusillanimous cricket. Cheers once again to the new India.</div>
Vidooshakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03194362115018768416noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-53733862330369337922017-06-20T16:25:00.000-05:002017-06-20T16:25:05.771-05:00India's ODI Template is Outdated<div style="text-align: justify;">
The vibrancy that is India's Test team is not reflected in its ODI and T20 outfit. The promise that every Test will be played to win is Virat Kohli's most refreshing and welcome quality. The days of hiding behind processes and being almost demure about going for wins is thankfully behind us...</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
...In Tests.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In LOI cricket however, the hangover of the previous generation persists. Virat Kohli, so far, has either been unable to shake it off or he is less confident of imposing his own fresh, new vision. When India's squad was announced for the Champions Trophy, it seemed a good one to win a World Championship if it were held a decade ago. IPL performances were ignored and the middle order and spin slots were treated as long service appreciation or servitude awards. Virat Kohli is clearly behind the curve when it comes to LOI cricket. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The captain of a country that is home to the most explosive T20 league in the world that throws up innovations every few years said, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
"Explosive cricket is not our brand"</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
uh...?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is something not quite Virat Kohli in India's LOI team. This still seems very much Mahendra Singh Dhoni's team. His vision. Something that worked in 2011, 2013 and to some extent in 2015 but clearly not good enough for the Fakhar Zamans and Shadab Khans of the world. Dhoni is a once great LOI master who probably doesn't have it in him to outsmart the bravado and fearlessness of the next generation of Pakistan Super League stars. He increasingly resembles a dead man walking, constantly checking around to see if he has done enough to keep his place in the side. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The win for Pakistan was a good one and for cricket romantics... even a heart warming one. India's LOI approach has been outdated for a while now and it would have been a tragedy if it wasn't "found out" in a global event of this scale and in the humiliating margin that eventually separated the 2 teams. It clearly calls for a fresh approach. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Pakistan, a country that is internationally isolated when it comes to cricket and doesn't have access to the IPL, shed its aging heroes and trusted the talent the Pakistan Super League threw up to leave the reigning Champions shell shocked and humiliated. If this were a 100 meter race, India wasn't even in the frame when Pakistan crossed the finish line. If this were a game of soccer, it had parallels to Brazil 1 - Germany 7. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India's approach to maintain the LOI supremacy it gained in 2011 have been to indulge in half measures so far. There is plenty of local talent to be found in the IPL only if India is willing to ignore the past achievements of our middle order and spinners in particular. None of whom had a half decent IPL but were still picked to maintain status quo; as if to assume that the opposing teams have stopped evolving themselves. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India's Test team is far more mentally strong. Right from the Adelaide Test in 2014, Virat Kohli's first Test as a stand in captain, the team has promised to play for wins and have delivered on that. It has lost matches going for improbable wins and set up wins from hopeless situations. Its a joy to watch them because no other Indian team has played such a positive game. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India's LOI side however, still has one foot in the old world. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India have world class talent emerging every IPL season but strangely unwilling to trust its own platform that throws up these stars. Why were IPL non-performances ignored when it came time to defend the Champions Trophy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Its not like I think Pakistan will sustain their success over a period of time. Come the 2019 World Cup at the same venue, they will obviously start as favorites but if Virat Kohli is fully entrusted with the reins for LOI cricket, I have a good feeling about 2019. </div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-53408694470624084772017-03-04T13:56:00.001-06:002017-03-04T13:56:29.210-06:00Go Green<p dir="ltr">It is now no longer about skills. Australia have assaulted India's pride. India might think it's about lack of proper judgement on part of their batsmen, Virat Kohli might admonish his fellow batsmen all he wants for not adapting or applying themselves. That is not going to salvage this series. </p>
<p dir="ltr">The desire that Australia have shown to keep the Border-Gavaskar trophy with themselves seems to have shocked the Indian team into a state of immobility. That Australia have not rolled over into submission as they were expected to have left the Indian team without the back to stand up to Australia's spinners. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Before this long Indian home season, Kohli had marked England among the visiting teams as the team to watch out for. Perhaps he was playing mind games with Australia. Either that has backfired or he was simply wrong in his assessment. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Perhaps India are simply mentally tired after a long home season. May be they did underestimate Australia even though they may never admit it. Perhaps it's just a case of Australia being too good for India so far. There was always the possibility of Australia's spin, with top class pace support and the prolific Steve Smith against India would make this a competitive series. No one was counting on Australia producing such a dominant performance.</p>
<p dir="ltr">There is no precedent to a visiting team felling India's famed batsmen under 200 in 3 straight innings. The response then also needs to be something that is unprecedented. Playing to their traditional strengths has been a shocking failure. </p>
<p dir="ltr">They can't seem to get Steve Smith out before he reaches three figures and they can barely last 2 or 3  sessions against Nathan Lyon and Steve O'Keefe. And KL Rahul's optimism about R Ashwin running through Australia on day 2 appears firmly grounded in delusion. Steve Smith himself has scored a comparable number of runs against India in the last 3 innings than the whole of India's batting has scored against Australia. It is beginning to feel like 20 of Steve Smiths 18 Test 100s have come against India. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Unless something remarkable happens tomorrow this is looking like 0-4 for India. Perhaps too early and irresposible to make it a prediction but after all we do know the making of a white wash feels like around this point in a series. </p>
<p dir="ltr">The only way I think India can now salvage this series is to swallow their pride about spin, and try to trip Australia on green tops. Nathan Lyon and Steve O'Keefe who were scoffed at before the tour are now the most fearsome duo of bowlers ever to visit India. <br>
To take them out of the game is India's best option if they lose this test too to Australian spin. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Among the many things so refreshing about Virat Kohli is how he has kept his fast bowlers engaged even in home conditions. It's time to ask them to salvage this series. Results from 3 innings is good enough to conceded that our batsmen can't handle Lyon and O'Keefe. Let's ask Australia to deal with our fast men. Surely they didn't come prepared for that. </p>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-72614838338291166512017-02-26T08:32:00.000-06:002017-02-26T08:35:07.995-06:00An Epic Backfire<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">One of the most refreshing aspects of Virat Kohli as a sportsman has been his willingness to feed off cricket crazy fans. While those before him at times seemed bogged down by misreading the adulation as "unreasonable expectations" to win every game, Virat Kohli has openly stated that his team will play every game to win and engages with the crowd urging them to egg his team on. </span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Those who came before him were willing , for the most part, to grind the opposition down by putting up runs on the board and slowly chipping away at the opposition batsmen and wait for the wicket to naturally deteriorate and go for the kill. This seemed to the Indian Template. Where runs on the board created the pressure in the absence of genuine fast balling and Tests, that appeared to head nowhere suddenly got alive on the last day. </span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Most Indian batsmen know how to play on these wickets. When India's own batsmen struggle at home and collapse in consecutive innings one has to wonder if the pitch was a factor. Nathan Lyon is an accomplished spinner and India have lost to him in Adelaide not too long ago. Steve O'Keefe had shown promise in the one Test he played on Australia's recent horror tour of Sri Lanka. Neither are this good though. To knock India out 2 innings in succession in India.</span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Kohli is the kind of sportsman that most fans of my generation: who grew up watching cricket in the late 70s and 80s, yearned for. A bad ass, no nonsense leader who wants to cleanse Indian teams of their infuriating tendency to seek personal milestones on the road to victory. A trait that has plagued the team for decades. </span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: wf_segoe-ui_normal, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols; font-size: 15px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">However his tendency to seek wins by controlling the pitch curating process is off putting. Not just because it sometimes backfires to humiliate like it did in Pune but it's not how most fans want to see India win.</span></div>
</div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-74213804218876814842016-08-15T13:39:00.001-05:002023-02-07T08:01:16.793-06:00Pakistan Near the Pinnacle<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This week, we saw a refreshing show of strength by all the South Asian teams. Sri Lanka hammered Australia at home and exposed their vulnerabilities to spin. As numerous articles in Cricinfo have pointed out, Australia simply have not recovered from the loss of their previous greats. Angelo Mathews must heave a sigh of relief after the virtual obliteration in England. Sri Lankan cricket seemed to have descended into mediocrity after Jayawardene and Sangakarra. But Mathews, Chandimal and Herath have brought them right back. Mendis' excellent innings in the first test too may raise hopes of a long term find.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Meanwhile, India recovered swiftly from their second test set-back (if one can call it that) and made quick work of West Indies. Virat Kohli made some astute changes and quickly put behind him, the tough draw in the second test. His desire to win every game is apparent in the way he attacks the opposition and throws everything he has in his arsenal at them. India can seal the number one spot with yet another win in the next test at Port of Spain. India have done well there traditionally and chances are that India will dominate that test. Virat Kohli is almost Steve Waugh-like in his desire to be ruthless. His team selection is un-emotional and exciting. Very few saw these changes coming (including me) but never-the-less it was a pleasant and pulsating exercise by the captain. At the risk of repeating myself, watching India play test cricket is a dream come true. So purely on results alone India deserve to be number one.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But the most remarkable cricket story is Pakistan's redemption at the Oval. They've firmly put back the spot-fixing, squabbles and domestic security issues and built themselves into a formidable team. They've beaten a strong team away from home against all odds. At the start of the series, Pakistan was not given much of a chance. England were formidable at home with their varied bowling attack. Pakistan's frailties with the bat are well known. Few thought that they could win the series with their bowling alone.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the end, Misbah-ul-Haq was named man of the series and aptly so. Younis Khan and Misbah-ul-Haq have made us fall in love with the Pakistan brand of cricket all over again. The sheer romance of Pakistan's cricket lies in the fact that they play what many consider to be an old-fashioned game. Yet time and again, they've proven that their passion for the game is second to none and their ability to switch on in key moments is top class. They've given us many moments to remember.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Younis Khan's 218 will rank as one of the greatest innings played in England. I can't remember the last time anyone scored a 200 against Anderson and Broad in England in their prime. To dig deep and come up with such a special innings away from home is the definition of greatness. Even more endearing has been the honest post match comments and interviews from both Misbah and Younis. They have the rare ability to remain in the present and grounded. Truly great sportsmen and we are lucky to have watched this series. Add Wahab Riaz to this pantheon and we have a group of cricketers who are grounded, real and salt-of-the-earth likeable.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Regardless of whether India becomes number one, Pakistan will rule the hearts of true cricket fans for months to come.</div>
</div>
Vidooshakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03194362115018768416noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-20255134701244395952016-08-08T16:06:00.001-05:002016-08-15T15:42:31.787-05:00It's enjoyable watching India in tests.....<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Watching India play test cricket has never been more enjoyable than now. The only other time India played more entertaining cricket across any format was in the 1985 B&H World Series in Australia. This was an ODI tournament. Whether the TV made it that way or whether the flamboyant keeper Sadanand Vishwanath did that I can't say, but it was mind blowingly entertaining.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This test team is by far the most entertaining Indian side I have watch in my lifetime. It plays riskier cricket than the Azhar-Tendulkar generations did or the Kapil/Gavaskar one before that and plays more solidly at the same time. A cool paradox, if you ask me. While the Tendulkar generation has accumulated a number of runs and records, this generation will accumulate more wins. Virat Kohli is the lynch pin of this transformation. Much like Clive Lloyd transformed the West Indies from merry losers to into fearsome winners, Virat is transforming Indian cricket from a team afraid of losing to a team daring to be beaten.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The most refreshing thing about Virat is that he is not afraid to lose. Between the lines I read, we used to lose anyways, why not lose fighting? At least give ourselves a chance. Change the reaction of the opposition with the team's attitude. I love his persistence with Umesh Yadav, who hasn't truly delivered yet, but from time to time delivered breathtaking spells that make one sit up with bated breath. The pressure he creates when on song and when he makes the batsmen hop is a connoisseur's dream. The bowling attack will create more wins. It needs a little more time. They are not in the same class as England or Australia, but those two teams possess generations of fast bowling knowledge. The Indian team is just starting out.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Appointing Kumble as coach has been a mistake in my opinion. But not a big one. Kumble will hopefully not be tainted by the safety first attitude of the Tendulkar/Ganguly era in overseas tests. Virat's refusal to include a sixth batsman is awesome. It may fail at times or even many times, but it's the only strategy that gives India a shot at winning more test matches. Four bowlers will tire after 2-3 test matches. Five bowlers can last longer assuming they bowl 30-45 overs per test. Srinath used to be run into the ground by his captains bowling 45-60 overs per test. Kumble's strike rates also tell a tale of overworked bowlers. It's a lose-lose proposition.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India won the first test with ease and put themselves into a winning position in the second. The wins will come with more experience of bowling with five bowlers. The new era is now underway and for one this writer is back watching test cricket after the listless last years of Tendulkar and Dhoni.</div>
</div>
Vidooshakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03194362115018768416noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-40935694547511409972015-12-10T12:02:00.002-06:002015-12-10T12:04:54.379-06:00India v South Africa: An Inauthentic Series Win for India<div style="text-align: justify;">
Most of the top 5 India batsmen in the recently concluded India v South Africa series had averages in the 20s and 30s. Ajinkya Rahane is the only one with a 50+ average and the only century maker over 4 tests in India. I don't remember any series in India where our top batsmen have averaged so low. Unless anyone thinks this South African attack was the most lethal to ever play on Indian shores; there is no question that the pitches behaved contrary to traditional Indian pitches.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When your team is winning, pumping their fists and thumping their chests at the fall of a wicket and you as a long time fan of the game, and the team, feel something hollow inside and don't even feel like joining in from your living room, you tend to question the authenticity of the win. The pitches in this series played out of character. Mohali didn't look and play like Mohali, Nagpur didn't look and play like Nagpur. It was hard not to question, whether the team had crossed the line and ordered an under prepared pitch and were justifying it as "home advantage"</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
For a casual fan, the most joyful wins are wins away from home, away from the subcontinent. We know those wins are rare but when they do come, we hold on to those forever. Those are wins our teams have achieved under conditions not only foreign but also achieved in settings where our teams had no control over.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And those same fans hope that home wins are authentic. Authentic in the sense that teams don't try to tweak too many control-ables in their favor. There is no honor in just winning for winning's sake. India may have won the series, India may feel they have the right to order pitches that their own batsmen struggle on, India may feel they have the right to deny criticism of the pitches. But they don't have the right to dictate what fans feel. If India's players want to win and enjoy their wins alone, they are welcome to. If they want to gain respect of their rivals and support of their fans, then they need to seek more authenticity to their home wins</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-JLSRPQHR6mk/Vmm9wXVV1_I/AAAAAAAAAag/c99Z9AYeuxM/s1600/virat-kohli-nagpur-test-win.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="300" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-JLSRPQHR6mk/Vmm9wXVV1_I/AAAAAAAAAag/c99Z9AYeuxM/s400/virat-kohli-nagpur-test-win.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The new Ricky Ponting?</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I hope this madness ends. I hope India learns not to counter their insecurity of winning on typical Indian pitches by doctoring them. This 3-0 score line is the most hollow, most in-authentic win I have ever witnessed</div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-42887763073255237232015-03-24T10:25:00.000-05:002015-03-24T10:39:09.421-05:00South Africa - Chokers no more<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">This was a curious South African team. Confidence misplaced, more words than deeds. Taking themselves too seriously. For a casual observer they gave a sense of someone running in the same place and feeling mighty pleased with themselves.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">As a player, AB DeVillers is all action. His performances speak for himself. As a captain he led a South African team who were seduced by themselves. Previous South African teams seduced us, this one was self seduced and we watched in amusement their skipper speak tall, bold words even as they lost almost all their matches to decent teams.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Except Sri Lanka, South Africa failed to beat any serious team.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">And yet, they believed they could win the cup. This is quite different from traditional South African teams who others believed in, spoke less, did more but ultimately did not have the self belief.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Before their game with India, in the group stages, South Africa were the favorites. They lost. Before their game with Pakistan, in the group stages, South Africa were the favorites. They lost. Before their semi final game with New Zealand, South Africa were the favorites. They lost.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #141823; display: inline; line-height: 19.3199996948242px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">It took sustained ineptitude to finally get rid of the chokers tag. Nobody can say South Africa choked. This time they were simply not good enough.</span></div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-11639543108086865902015-03-07T12:34:00.002-06:002015-03-10T14:54:13.274-05:00Why do we let South Africa seduce us?<div style="text-align: justify;">
I remember the days when South Africa were banned from international cricket. There was a lot of intrigue around them. I had read about people like Clive Rice, about Graham Pollock; that he had a batting average of almost 61... I had read about the exploits of Barry Richards, Mike Procter who bowled off the wrong foot; if I remember my reading correctly... knew a bit about Eddie Barlow, Ali Bacher....</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I knew that without South Africa international cricket was missing a formidable team.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I watched with keen interest when India welcomed South Africa back to the international fold and I remember watching on TV Alan Donald charging in and bowling fast in India in a one day game. He was bowling faster than Malcom Marashall I had thought. Later when India became the first team to tour South Africa for a full Test series, I remember Pravin Amre scoring a dour century on debut.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Then came the 1992 world cup. Within a year of South Africa returning back to the international game, they were getting a chance to play the World Cup. Every one was curious as to how would they compare and compete with other international team. Having followed India's games with them, they clearly seemed a stronger side to me.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A lot of buzz around the 1992 world cup was due to South Africa's presence. It seemed like they had the sympathy vote. For what .... I don't know but it seemed to me that people wanted them to do well.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And then Johnty Rhodes flew out Inzamam Ul-Haq....</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And the world was seduced.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
South Africa brought in a very different brand of cricket to the World Cup. They fielded like no other team had fielded before, they seemed better coached and their cricket seemed rational and unemotional. They didn't smile like the West Indians did, they didn't have nearly as much the passion like the Pakistanis did, they seemed a bit like the Australians, scowling all the time and taking themselves too seriously but more mechanical. They didn't seem to have India's flair or guile. They were as good as any other team and different too.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
But ever since that 1992 World Cup they have seduced cricket fans like no other team has.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Since their re-entry they have started every world cup being considered as legitimate favorites. And yet after 26 years of World Cup history behind them, they have yet to win a knockout game in the World Cup. Their exits are a combination of bad luck, foolishness, panic, screwed up rain rules, math errors, tactical blunders and stage fright.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1992 silly rain rule left them needing to get 22 runs off one ball, when before the rain they had 18 balls to get them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1996 they came up with a brain dead idea of dropping Alan Donald for the quarter finals and Brian Lara made them pay.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1999 they picked Alan Donald for their semifinal against Australia but he had a brain freeze of his own which resulted in his getting run out, the game ending as a tie and Australia progressing on the basis of a previous Super Six match win.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 2003 they forgot that D/L targets list scores needed to equal and that teams have to score one more than the D/L score listed to win a game. As the rain came down Boucher meekly tapped the last ball before the rain meekly to mid wicket which tied the game when they needed to win it.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 2007, they were too jittery in the semi finals and the match was effectively over in 10 overs with South Africa 27-5</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 2011 they collapsed chasing a smallish target against another fellow chokers, New Zealand who before that game hadn't won any knock-out game themselves.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is their 7th attempt. But isn't 6 flops good enough to ask the question why do we let South Africa seduce us every 4 years?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Why for instance before their game against Pakistan, were South Africa considered favorites and no one was giving Pakistan any chance. What is it about South Africa's weakness we are willing to ignore and what is it about Pakistan's strengths which they have demonstrated in almost every world cup barring 2007; that we are unwilling to acknowledge.</div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-53809947156390777962015-02-17T15:05:00.000-06:002015-02-17T15:12:19.081-06:00Beating Pakistan just isn't the same any more<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">For those of us who watched "that shot" Javed Miandad deposited into the crowd off a Chetan Sharma full-toss; these 6 wins in the World Cup, starting in Sydney 1992 against Pakistan are sweet revenge.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">You know...I want to feel that way but I don't.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Perhaps that sixer has already been avenged or it may never be. Try as I may, I do not believe India has won a one-day game; a final at that; in quite the fashion Javed Miandad did that day in 1986. May be Sachin's attack on Shoaib Akhtar at Centurion in the 2003 World Cup game comes a little close. Both were true assaults on the psyche of respective fans. But I'd have to get into the mind of a Pakistani cricket fan for a little while to know if those knocks are comparable.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">But...I don't think "that shot" needs to be avenged any more....</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Recent Indian teams, it seems, have the same attitude and skill that we envied about Pakistani teams of the 80s and 90s. Mahendra Singh Dhoni, Shikhar Dhawan, Suresh Raina and Virat Kohli are as Pakistani in the way they clinically chase targets or set them up that they could very well be the Javed Miandad, Ijaz Ahmen, Saleem Malik and Aamir Sohail from a generation ago.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">But we don't have a Wasim Akram or a Waqar Younis or even an Aqib Javed....so any comparison to those Pakistani teams that traumatized us can only be a superficial search for a non existent symmetry,</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Over the years Pakistan cricket has suffered. They no longer field teams like they used to in the 80s and 90s...even early 2000s. For that 2003 Centurion game, Pakistan had fielded a strong team. It meant something when India chased down that formidable total.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Compared to that game, the 2011 and 2015 wins seem facile.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Before the Adelaide game during the current World Cup it seemed this was Pakistan's best chance to finally win one against India. India had not won anything on the long tour and there were some doubts creeping in my mind if the reason for that was a weakness in the team exploited by Australian conditions.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The manner in which the game unfolded however and the meekness of Pakistan's fight makes that initial gut assessment look foolish.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">While there is relief that India has won another game and the streak is still in tact, one cannot ignore the feeling of the win being facile. Moreover, recent trend holds no promises of enthralling contests like the ones in Sharjah 1986 and Centurion 2003.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">There is no joy in beating Pakistan anymore because it seems to be happening so often these days and its hard to ignore that recent Pakistan teams are like poorly made Bollywood sequels of relatively decent-er originals.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Having witnessed West Indies's demise in its entirety, I fear that Pakistan cricket is headed the same way. The frequency of a new "fast bowling find" has drastically reduced and there is no batsman that has emerged in the last few years that can come even remotely close to the likes of Virat Kohli or Shikhar Dhawan. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-84629234365305032412015-02-11T10:02:00.001-06:002015-02-11T10:15:01.313-06:00The World Cup<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
The last people to let go of their old gods are the loyal priests. And Srinivasan is the latest example where the cabal most benefiting from his occupation of BCCI and ICC's chair is the one that's most quiet and protective of him. There is no doubt that its self-preservation at work because without these old gods, the priest would have to re-think their lives. </div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
As painful as the saga of Srinivasan has been, it's been more painful to hear the deafening silence of the cricketing gods. India has perhaps survived for many centuries of conquests due to its ability to "shake it off" and continue as if nothing happened. And so we continue to indulge in navel gazing and waiting for the next puppet to emerge from the shadows. The heroes for many of these loyal priests seem to be the Putin-Medvedev combine and not the high standards set by Mandela or Washington. But it's dumb to even think that a man more or less accused of re-writing the constitution to suit his personal agenda would display any different behavior nor that his cabal would condemn it.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
Its painful to hear Shastri, Gavaskar, Dhoni and others talk about BCCI and Srinivasan as being the same and pointing to high player salaries and perks as the justification for their enduring admiration. Is this what sport is all about now? Are our sporting gods all about this now? Do they believe that getting a fair deal is a blessing and that it's due to one individual? And that if Srinivasan were to be criticized or held accountable for over-reach, they would lose their pay? And so it's ok to cower in blackmail? What about the cricket? Is cricket in India beholden to one or two persons' largesse? Really?</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
And the Indian team is a clear reflection of what can be despite our administrators' best efforts to hog the limelight. I think Dhoni is a super player and a great captain. And I think Kohli is playing the brand of cricket that I hoped Tendulkar would always play. Kohli doesn't have Tendulkar's aura yet and he will likely never have that mystique due to the privacy that was dear to Tendulkar. However, Kohli with his public engagement and willingness to live life on his terms without any apologies is refreshing. I sincerely hope that people who don't like his brashness and are worshipers of humility don't trash him the moment he starts failing. He deserves as long a rope if not longer than what Tendulkar was given when his form slumped.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
India has no bowling worth the name and it's batting is struggling to come to grips with Australia. While Rohit Sharma's form is a welcome sign, Dhawan hasn't produced a single meaningful innings in all his time in Australia. And without both openers being in form, India have no chance. Turning to Kohli or Dhoni or magic in every game isn't a formula for success. Rahane and Raina can add bulk but cannot turn games on their head. At best they are valuable supporting cast. The players that can take the game away from the opposition are Rohit, Kohli and Dhoni. These are the men that no one has answers for.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
Pakistan is inspired and yet I don't see how they can topple this Indian team. But if Pakistan has had a better chance I don't know of one. India usually don't start well in such tournaments but this would be a home world cup for India given the amount of time they've spent in Australia.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
This Pakistan team under Misbah is a team that I can like. Misbah, Afridi and Younis represent the three types of Pakistan teams that we've all come to see. Misbah is about the steel and pride that Zaheer Abbas and Asif Iqbal reflected, Afridi is the mercurial ability Inzy, Akram and Waqar played with and Younis is about the passion that we saw from Imran, Sarfraz, Miandad and Saeed Anwar. There is a certain beauty to Pakistan cricket that few teams can match.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" trbidi="on">
I put India a nose ahead in this game simply because Indians have played a lot of cricket and don't usually need miracles to win games. They are experienced and know when to turn it on.</div>
Vidooshakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03194362115018768416noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-24026934844510298832015-02-08T06:31:00.001-06:002015-02-08T06:33:59.780-06:00World Cups in Australia<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;">Mahendra Singh Dhoni has had to resort to - "This is more or less the same team than won the Champions Trophy" and "These guys know how to deliver in ICC tournaments"... He is essentially pleading to keep the faith in his team. You surely can't expect him to say what he really thinks, which could be "How on God's green earth am I going to win anything worthwhile with this team"</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;">A World Cup in Aus<span class="text_exposed_show" style="display: inline;">tralia always seems enticing for an Indian fan. Memories of getting up early to watch Roger Binny take out David Boon, Azharuddin fielding like an international cricketer pulling off a catch at point and India winning the World Championship of cricket are still fresh. The few times India have done well in Australia somehow mask the routine mauling and disappointments India has been subjected to in Australia.</span></span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;">
</span><span class="text_exposed_show" style="background-color: white; display: inline;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The last time too, in 1992, India had embarked on what Sanjay Manjrekar called "an endless summer". That world cup had ended in disappointment. Shrikanth holing out to Deepak Patel to that one fielder on long-on to start a must win game against New Zealand, Venkatapathi Raju celebrating too early and getting run-out going for a run that could have tied the game against Australia, rain ruining the game against Sri Lanka and Ian Botham taking out Sachin Tendulkar when he seemed set to take control of the chase...</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The lasting images of that World Cup did not include many Indian moments. Inzamam's mauling of New Zealand, Johnty - the airplane, a Wasim Akram special in the final, New Zealand's innovations at the beginning of each innings; batting and bowling... </div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: #141823; font-family: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
That World Cup was also where 2 themes took birth. South Africa's emergence as a side that could find impossible reasons to lose a match they have all but won (The crooked rain rule cost India and South Africa games they should have won) and India never having lost a game to Pakistan at a World Cup.</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: #141823; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Given how this Indian team has done so far on the tour, there shouldn't be much optimism to even match the performance from 1992. It seems that the fight India showed in the Test series was false advertisement for the World Cup.</span></div>
</span></span>Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-19669992578181609062015-02-02T08:19:00.002-06:002015-02-02T08:20:55.661-06:00The World Cup is providing diminishing value<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The format of this World Cup is such that it would be virtually impossible for India to not qualify for the Quarter Finals, 5 weeks into the excrutiatingly long tournament after an equally long winless series against Australia and England on this tour. It would be commendable if India go any deeper into this tournament </span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">It is sad how, over the years, the game has become lopsided in terms of distribution of sporting prowess. </span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The West indies are a side in turmoil, where they have got themselves into a situation where they cannot send their best side. Pakistan seem to be stuck in the 80s; some may say England's too. The promise of Bangladesh now seems misplaced and Zimbabwe's political situation has left its cricket weak. Post 2003, World Cups have ceased to be truly open events and the decline of many teams has robbed the recent World Cups of a good amount of high quality competition.</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Administrators may pat themselves on the back for maximizing their revenue streams, but for the average fan the World Cup is providing diminishing value. It is in the hands of sides like Afghanistan, Ireland, Scotland and UAE to deliver that excitement in the early stages. Australia, New Zealand and South Africa seem set to do the same in the knock out stages. Pakistan having won the World Cup in Australia before, has to get a token mention as a dark horse, simply as a mark of respect for Imran Khan's triumph in 1992.</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">India is a side bound to be weighed down by the length of the tour and judicual proceedings at home and their World Cup may well end emotionally just as soon as it begins if the place where 'the streak' started also becomes the place where Pakistan finally win one against India. </span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-18484534784387669732014-04-08T11:34:00.001-05:002014-04-08T20:18:15.990-05:00I think I know how Yuvraj feels<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Last year me and
2 very good friends; one of them Vidooshak; decided to train for
and run the marathon. </span><span style="font-family: inherit;">Like all feats of
physical activity, running a marathon requires focus, training and serious
amounts of motivation.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Each of us set
goals, drew up training plans and went about the training in earnestness. Each
of us was at varying levels of physical fitness and set our goals accordingly.
I set mine to run a sub 4 hour marathon. Millions have finished marathons, but
only about 20% of them finish within 4 hours. I had run 2 marathons before and I
wanted to enter the somewhat elite club of sub 4 hour marathoners; so I could;
with reasonable etiquette; look down upon the majority of ‘just finishers’.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">My previous best
marathon was a 4:39 when I was 10 years younger. I wasn’t in the mood for
anything that would make my goal seem unreal. Plus this time I was going to train
specifically to run fast, so this goal seemed logical to me. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">To motivate
myself, I started making public my goals to anyone and everyone who would ask;
friends, family, acquaintances and eventually passersby and imaginary people. Among
the close circle of friends this was a race between the 3 of us. I might have
something to do with hyping it up. For weeks leading up the marathon, we made
sure the conversation was running, how we were doing in training and based on our
training time, who was the favorite to win.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">We hyped it to no
end. I did.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">My training was
all wrong. I convinced myself that training on inclines with heavy shoes would
make me a stronger runner. That when I transition to lighter, minimal shoes as
the marathon date appeared closer, I would magically be able to run 9 minute
miles required to safely finish a marathon under 4 hours.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The epic day
arrived.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Everyone who I
remotely knew, knew was going for a sub 4 marathon and that I wanted to finish ‘first’
among the 3 of us friends.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">I spotted the
3:55 pace setter and ran. Running Miles 1 through 10 was a breeze. I was feeling
light, I was right on target pace and I was running without a care for the
remaining distance. Then I felt a slight twitch in my left calf. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">I ignored it.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">At mile 13, I was
slightly ahead of my target pace. I
thought the twitch was just a twitch. Sub 4 was a foregone conclusion.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">A few hundred
meters into mile 14, there were no twitches in my calf. It was a full blown
cramp. I stopped, stretched massaged and off I went again; only for my right
calf to cramp up. I hobbled a couple of more miles before I resigned myself to
the reality that sub 4 is history.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">By now I was
walking<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">A few moments
later it dawned on me…what a flop I was. After weeks and months of hyping this
race, when it came crunch time, I broke down. I felt vain, defeated, stupid and
above all a complete loser. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">I eventually
walked the second half of the marathon, with a finish time of 5:14. A full hour
and 14 minutes more than what I wanted to do. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">After I crossed
the finish line, I remember thinking, may be this is how sportsmen feel when
they fail in a big game. I was instantly more sympathetic towards them. I told
myself I will be less critical of players who flop or freeze in crunch time. Will
be less flippant about calling <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">South
Africa</st1:country-region></st1:place> chokers, will be more sympathetic when
a batsman does not deliver in face of a mounting asking rate. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Because, as Mahendra
Singh Dhoni said, no one wants to do badly. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">In my case, after
analyzing my training, I figured that my approach was all wrong. Within 6
months I am ready one more time to have a second shot at a sub 4 marathon. This
time I used a training plan from an expert. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">No one can
question Yuvraj’s commitment or earnestness. Neither can one discount the fact
that his innings was one of the key contributing factors to <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">India</st1:place></st1:country-region> losing
the finals. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">When people
criticize Yuvraj, they are not discounting his previous contributions. So
Sachin, Harbhajan and company, please don’t recant his resume to us.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Ever since Yuvraj
has returned from cancer treatments, I am not questioning his desire, his earnestness,
his ability. I am wondering though if he has been given the right support to
succeed. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Why Yuvraj failed
is not Yuvraj’s problem alone. We somehow have to get his confidence back. A
repeat of 2011 in 2015 is hard to visualize with Yuvraj sitting at home in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">India</st1:place></st1:country-region><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-83791141157729006052014-02-26T16:30:00.000-06:002014-02-26T16:30:40.897-06:00Mahendra Singh Dhoni's credibility<div style="text-align: justify;">
I wonder if anyone truly expected this Indian team to win any of the 2 series that they eventually lost recently. In South Africa and New Zealand. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That they came close to winning 3 of those Tests, was an over achievement.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Indian teams struggle overseas and only the settled batting line ups with a couple of potent bowlers to exploit the alien conditions have traditionally been able to win games for India outside the sub continent. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Indian teams have enjoyed brief periods of supremacy outside India. Ajit Wadekars team in 1971, Kapil Dev and his men in 1985 and Ganguly's teams 2003 onwards which won consistently abroad all had great batting line ups with skiful bowlers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
By contrast this team led by Dhoni is a new one. The batsman performed well above expectations and while the bowlers were amazing in patches, they were unable to sustain the advantage.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hence when experts, including ex-cricketers criticize this team for coming up empty, I am temped to question their expectation and the basis for it. Add to that the attempt to include the colossal failings of India's ageing seniors and count them as losses against Mahindra Singh Dhoni seems rather unjust to me.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The team that refused to chase 90 odd in 15 overs in Domenica in 2011 and lost 8 straight games thereafter, and this team that came close to winning both in South Africa and New Zealand are different teams. The earlier team was humiliated. This one gave an excellent account of themselves. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Given this teams performance, the right question to ask is, why did we hold on to Sachin and co for so long. Instead this team has been burdened with the disasters of their more eminent predecessors. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I don't see how you can criticize Mahendra Singh Dhoni for leading a young, still learning team, to 2 away series losses. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All is not well with Dhoni, though.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That however has little to do with the team's performance in the away series but Dhoni's testimony to the Supreme Court appointed commission that parroted his boss's stance that Gurunath Meiyappan was a mere cricket enthusiast in relation to his role at the IPL team CSK. When contrasted against the Mugdal committee eventual ruling rejecting this notion, India's cricket captain finds his credibility and integrity brought into question.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
India's cricket stars can never be expected to truly speak their minds because the cost of doing that is often in millions of dollars. The BCCI is not averse to humiliating even its greatest cricketer in Kapil Dev, so that he falls in line. But surely at some point one of them will realize that their integrity is above the cash that the BCCI throws at them. Or may be not. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I think Mahendra Singh Dhoni has implicated himself with his testimony into a position where I don't know if any of his on field exploits and bravado are enough to justify his hold over the national team captaincy. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The BCCI has so far done nothing in response to the Mugdal committe report. Promises of cleaning up the league have remained promises. Perhaps forgotten. They seem unwilling to even impose their own rules. CSK continue to be a part of the league.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The BCCI is a strong politically influential body. However I do not believe they can continue to ignore the Mugdal committee findings. A committee formed by the Supreme Court of India. The only way I can see CSK still be a part of the IPL family and Mahendra Singh Dhoni continuing as India's captain is if the BCCI rewrite its own rules for the IPL to in effect legalize match fixing from retrospective effect. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The sponsors have given no indication that a clean league is a prerequisite before they associate their brands with the IPL. The people have shown no indication that they pay money to watch sports. They come to the games to socialize and be entertained. They turn on the TV as an alternative to Reality Television. The players have time and again justified their quest for cash. The IPL will sustain, even if matches are fixed or even if there is just a perception that matches are fixed.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So why not make it official. Remove all pretense of wanting a clean league and a clean game. Let every one make money. Change the rules. Delete the clauses under which Gurunath Meiyappan is being pursued. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Just don't call it sport.</div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-36000812639420187462014-02-10T14:53:00.001-06:002014-02-10T14:53:36.551-06:00Why criticize the BCCI?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Sachin Tendukar was once accused of ball tampering in South Africa. I personally thought at that time, it was rather unfair. This was the early 2000s. Match referees back then tended to be more lenient towards the western nations and Indians in particular used to be banned for such things as "excessive appealing". Had it been Ricky Ponting in place of Sachin Tendulkar, I doubt if the late Mike Dennes would have bothered to even issue a warning for the same misdemeanor. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There was a huge uproar as Mike Dennes issued a one match suspension to Sachin and a few other team mates.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That was the first time the BCCI bullied its way to right, what in their eyes was a wrong. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
BCCI refused to honor the ban. ICC, for their part, refused to give "Test" status to the subsequent match. between the 2 sides. India and South Africa played anyway. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All was well...and the BCCI lived happily ever after... as a bully..</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The most blatant act of BCCI bullying was Sydney 2008. After losing a Test fair and square, the BCCI and the Indian players sulked and flexed their financial muscle and threatened to leave the tour mid-way if Steve Buknor was not removed as the umpire. Cricket Australia and the ICC obliged. There are dozens of games every year that teams lose because of bad umpiring. But the BCCI know they have the means to do something about it. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So, yes.... I do believe the BCCI is a bully.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And now once again, we are being told by most opinion dispensers that the BCCI is bullying again. By wanting more control of the ICC and "forcing" Cricket Australia and the England and Wales Cricket Board to demand more of the ICC revenue.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This time however, I am not entirely certain the BCCI deserves as much of the criticism as they seem to be getting. The BCCI have been pretty clear; as clear as they possibly can; that they would be better off playing cricket in a manner than maximizes their profits and that some of the cricket the ICC wants them to play isn't aligned to their goals. For the BCCI the Future Tours and Program is a hindrance.<br />
<br />
The BCCI wants to do what every board is doing. Play the game for higher and higher profits, yet a disproportionate amount of abuse is hurled towards the BCCI only because they are one of the few boards actually succeeding in the pursuit. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All cricket, every where, from the beginning of time, be it the Ashes, the Pentangular tournaments in pre Independence India, India's tour of Australia in 1977-78 to counter Kerry Packer, the IPL, county cricket, was and is played because at the core it makes or protect money for the people involved. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
From what I understand what the BCCI has proposed is this...</div>
<span style="text-align: justify;"><ul>
<li>"<i>We don't need the ICC to tell us whom to visit and host and when. We can manage that perfectly well</i>". In this arrangement, India may never play the likes of Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. Instead they may play a 7 ODI series with Australia. This is already happening today. So what's new.</li>
</ul>
<div>
<br /></div>
<ul>
<li><i>"We need more money from the ICC revenue because we help you make more money"</i>. This will mean that countries like Sri Lanka, Pakistan and the likes will get even lesser money than they get today. (N. Srinivasan insists that everyone will get more money in this deal. This is only possible if the pie itself increases substantially) The way I read this is that these boards have failed to properly invest the money they receive from the ICC to make the cricket they play sustainable. As a consequence they are being held accountable and penalized (in a way and in a matter of speaking) by the BCCI, CA and ECB. I am of the opinion that the BCCI is in a better position to use the money more wisely and grow the game and the pie for everyone. However much we would like to believe; a billion people did not watch Sachin Tendulkar bat... and bring "joy to their lives". The Indian market is still a work in progress. Growth potential is immense. Instead of giving the money to Sri Lanka to waste on a Test Series with Bangladesh that no one watches, the BCCI will use it to play cricket that converts more Indians to cricket fans. It is one thing to appreciate and like Test cricket and want to preserve it, its entirely foolish to believe that the BCCI would be okay with wasting money (generated largely due to India's brand) just so that a Test match is played in Bangladesh that 300 people watch. </li>
</ul>
<div>
<br /></div>
<ul>
<li><i>"If you do not agree to our proposal, we will walk away from ICC tournaments"</i>. Essentially the BCCI is saying we don't need ICC tournaments. You need India to participate in ICC tournaments. Remember the 2007 World Cup. India crashed out and suddenly all interest in the tournament evaporated. Even in bilateral series's, outside of the ICC ambit, why do you think we don't see a repeat of the 2002 New Zealand tour? Because it does not make financial sense to beat India in a Test in 2 days. You cannot make money in an ICC tournament or a bilateral series, unless India lasts long enough</li>
</ul>
<div>
<br /></div>
</span><ol>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I won't criticize the BCCI for wanting to do what administrators have always done. Ensure more and more profits. To blame just the BCCI for this unjustified. Criticism by Mike Atherton against the Big 3 for wanting greater control over the ICC is rooted in noble ideals without much understanding of the practicalities as seen by the BCCI. If the BCCI feels that the ICC is limiting its potential to earn revenue and if the ICC can offer no counter incentive; then the current arrangement, where BCCI has more control over the global game; is the most realistic.<br />
<br />
Where else have there been examples of organizations giving up control over something as lucrative, for the "greater good"? </div>
</div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-29553163994069975242014-02-07T14:20:00.000-06:002014-02-10T12:05:39.329-06:00The KP Mess<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
England have become the running joke for players all over the world. From amateur cricketers to roadside tyros to full time pros everyone is scratching their heads trying to figure this out. If performance isn't the criteria what is? England's message seems to be, "you are part of the team if you are a middling semi-performer but obedient."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The finger has to be pointed at Andy Flower. He seems to believe in his own coaching style over the talent that his players have. England lost in Australia only because KP played poorly. What that means is that the rest of the players' contribution is immaterial. To turn a match around, England needed KP to step up. If Flower, Cook and Prior couldn't motivate KP to deliver their sorry asses need to be thrown out. To blame KP for the series loss while hanging on to proven non-difference-makers like Tim Bresnan et al shows just how much England's administrative head needs a collective brainwash or a flush down the toilet.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The world is welcome to sympathize with Jonathan Trott who was persisted with though he was suffering from stress related illness. For the life of me, I can't figure out what's taboo about this illness. Players are left out from the side for having the flu, a toothache and delhi belly. Why did Flower and company knowingly include a player that was suffering from a far bigger condition than any of these. Shouldn't the finger of blame be squarely put on Andy Flower for backing an unfit player while trying to "tame" a proven match-winner? Trott left the team early and Flower had no real back up plan.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I've ranted often against self-absorbed administrators who seem to think that they have the power of God to turn mediocre players into super-stars. For every player that one or two good coaches do seem to turn around, they destroy several others. When are they going to realize that it's about the players and trying to get the best out of them? KP has a good 3-4 years left in him and he's going to ply his trade in the IPL and sundry leagues. Andy Flower may think that he has won a victory, but all he's managed to do is to set England back by 2-4 years.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Australia showed the way when they got rid of "homework" Mickey and rehabilitated both Warner and Watson. The results were astounding. England on the other hand pandered to Andy Flower and paid the price. They continue to genuflect to his "genius", not realizing that he is way past his prime. To give him KPs head as a parting gift is a huge tragedy. For all his "accomplishments", Flower remains just another ego-maniacal ex-player who is too full of himself.</div>
</div>
Vidooshakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03194362115018768416noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-74517211417634059072013-12-23T10:27:00.000-06:002013-12-24T05:48:11.509-06:00The 'Draw' at the Wanderers<div style="text-align: justify;">
When Faf Du Plessis was brilliantly run out by Ajinkya Rahane with 16 runs still to get at the Wanderers yesterday, I thought India had decisively inched ahead of South Africa. During the entire Test match, while South Africa kept coming back; India for the most part seemed ahead of South Africa. Having been in a position of advantage for a longer duration and having Faf Du Plessis run out with 16 still to get, I thought India would be more disappointed at not having won this Test. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At the end of the ODI series, however, had anyone offered a draw to India at Wanderers, I am sure India would have gladly accepted. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
South Africa on the other hand after the ODI series, would be very disappointed with a draw at the Wanderers. However, Once India's bowlers, Virat Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara put India into a position of authority in this Test by the end of the 4th day; South Africa may be more relieved with escaping with a draw. Of course there must be a sense of disappointment at not having enough left to force a win. even while AB De Villiers and Faf Du Plessis put South Africa to striking distance of a win, at no point I felt South Africa could go for a win without taking risks.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Even after tea time when both Faf Du Plessis and AB De Villiers were batting so well, there was far too many runs and quite a bit of time still left for India to bowl South Africa out. South Africa could ill afford taking any risks. By the time the target had reached touching distance, they were just one wicket away from exposing Imran Tahir and a severely handicapped Morne Morkel to India's fast bowlers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I can understand why South Africa did not go for the win and settled for a draw. Victory for them was never really possible without risking a loss.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Once South Africa started playing for the draw, what surprised me was that India too did not try to force a win. The last overs bowled at Dale Steyn and Vernon Philander didn't have any balls that looked like balls to take a wicket. The bouncers and short balls at Steyn were way too harmless and the intent was to go along with South Africa's desire to draw the game.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Perhaps, India reflected on how far they had come from the ODI series and assessed the draw positively given how heavily underrated they were to even put up a fight against South Africa. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Ultimately the first Test of the series ended up being engaging affair and through out the Test I was wondering what Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Gautam Gambhir, and Virendra Sehwag must be thinking. For far too long we were sold the story that only batsmen of that caliber can compete on foreign pitches. In England, Australia and South Africa. Gambhir had us believe that somehow career averages count for runs in matches in progress.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
That a young team on their maiden "away" Test arrested the 8 consecutive away losses was in it self uplifting. A win at the Wanderers would have been one of India's greatest away wins. Bigger than Adelaide 2003. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Why were we holding back these young players and why were we clinging on to players well past their prime who were delivering loss after loss?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-686425684324303857.post-65138009979837733022013-12-12T14:11:00.002-06:002013-12-12T14:25:55.851-06:00Fear of fast bowling<div style="text-align: justify;">
Not that I can ever claim to know this for a fact but anyone who is in the path of a cricket ball hurled at 95, 100 miles per hour is bound to have a moment where questions regarding personal safety crop up. While the ball is coming at your head, these safety questions are being addressed in the mind and an appropriate response; whether to duck, fend, hook, etc is being formulated; for that brief micro second, (the period before a response is finalized) there is bound to be a bit of fear.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I don't care if the batsman is the great Sir Vivian Richards, Sunil Gavaskar or Monty Panesar.<br />
<br />
In one of the most candid recollections of India's World Cup win in 1983, Sandip Patil openly talks of the 'fear' of having to face the great West Indian bowlers. So the fear is real, acknowledged by all. And Patil knows a thing or two about giving it back to the fast men. Ask Len Pascoe and Bob Willis.<br />
<br />
That facing fast bowling requires overcoming of ones fears is a given. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hence, I find comments by David Warner and Dale Steyn openly suggesting that English and Indian batsmen respectively are 'scared' of fast, short pitched bowling extremely distasteful. Because their statements imply 'fear' not as something batsmen are willing to overcome, rather something less manly and cowardly is implied.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Its not like England and India have not played and won games in Australia and South Africa before. These are not teams of untested amateurs. England and India are accomplished teams of proven performers. England have been the best Test Team in the world and India are holders of the Champions Trophy. A trophy they won, not in India, but in England, beating teams like South Africa, England, West Indies, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Many of these teams have world class fast bowlers who weren't bowling spin. This team that won the Champions Trophy is the exact same Indian team that is struggling in South Africa. Shekhar Dhawan, Rohit Sharma Ishant Sharma, et al included </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The ongoing Ashes series has been absorbing to watch. Mitchell Johnson has provided the kind of exhilarating performances not witnessed since the glory days of Wasim Akram. Yes Mitchel Johnson has left the English batsmen gasping for breath. They don't seem to know how to respond to his pace and accuracy. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, when Australian batsmen come to India and dance to the tune of Indian spinners does anyone taunt them, suggesting they are "scared"? They are afforded the basic respect that they simply do not have the technical expertise and training to play spin in conditions alien to them. Similarly, lets not question the English team's professionalism. When a David Warner says that he saw "fear" in Trott's eyes, let me assure you the player who falls in people's estimation is not Johnathan Trott, its David Warner. What kind of a player taunts an opponent like that?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When a Steyn says "Indian batsmen are scared" its his standing as a fair competitor that takes a beating. For everyone knows that there is nothing embarrassing about this Indian team. Yes they will struggle against fast bowling. Yes, they will close their eyes, get hit with a ball headed for their skulls, but they have the heart, the smarts, the will, to win Test matches in South Africa. Like the generation before them, these guys will learn to win Test matches in South Africa.</div>
Golandaazhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11593900110552569215noreply@blogger.com1